Should you be required to have objective evidence in order to win your long term disability insurance claim and get the benefits you need?
At first glance, the answer to this question seems fairly obvious: yes. If your insurer is going to send you a disability check, there should be an objective way to prove that you are suffering from an issue that keeps you from working.
But how does this requirement for objective proof work for conditions where there are no known objective tests that can provide proof? Should these people be automatically denied because the testing just does not exist? Again, the answer seems obvious: no.