Social Security Disability

Do you know that Social Security can charge you civil penalties and assessments if they think you mislead them into giving you money? If not, consider yourself lucky, because I can tell you as an experienced Social Security Disability attorney that it happens far too often.

The general idea behind the penalties and assessments isn’t a bad one. Social Security wants to punish those who are cheating the system so the money will be there for people who really need it. The problem with this however is that Social Security is a giant bureaucracy that makes mistakes all the time.

Judging by the Social Security questions I get, lots of people are well aware that the Social Security Administration (SSA) is in the middle of a budget crisis, and they are worried about how this will affect them.

To put it bluntly, people are right to be worried. While the benefits you receive from Social Security and SSI shouldn’t be directly affected, there are a number of ways that regular people will be impacted by the financial troubles the organization is having. Just a few key examples are a longer wait at field offices, increased processing times, and some people will have to travel further for Social Security Disability hearings. More than ever before, you need professionals on your side who know disability law.

Every Texas Social Security disability attorney knows that the official job definitions that the SSA goes by in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) are old and out of date. The organization has even been getting advice from an independent panel to help out with job data since 2008 while they work on creating a new Occupational Information System (OIS), but recently the SSA decided not to renew the panel’s charter and will be working alone again.

Why is the SSA so worried about updating this system now? Simple. Because they want to save money, and changing the definitions in a way that’s favorable to the SSA could make it harder for people to prove that they have disabilities that prevent them from working and making a living.

If your claim has been denied, you’ll need to attempt a Social Security Disability appeal so you can get the benefits that you need to survive. That means going through a hearing in front of a special judge called an ALJ (administrative law judge).

As a Social Security Disability attorney, I can tell you that everyone going through a Social Security Disability appeal has to have an ALJ hearing. You may be assigned an in-person hearing or a video hearing, but one way or another you’re going in front of a judge.

Because video hearings are cheaper for the SSA, they want more of them and have been working hard to increase the number of facilities out there that can do this. Under the current rules you can refuse video hearings for any reason, but that may not be the case in the future.

SSA rules for a Social Security Disability appeal hearing clearly say that vocational experts (VEs) are expected to testify in person or by using video conference. Unfortunately, some judges seem to think that this is just an arbitrary guideline.

It doesn’t happen often, but there have been times when I’ve taken a client in front of a judge and we’ve been notified right then and there that the VE offering evidence from the government will be calling in on their cell phone. Blindsiding claimants and their representatives in this way is not only unethical, it’s completely against the SSA’s own rules for Social Security Disability!

If you’re in the middle of a Social Security Disability appeal, you want to ensure two things: that you have a great legal team, and that the medical consultants (MCs) you hire are the best of the best. But want if those consultants already work for the Social Security Administration (SSA) or even a completely unrelated state agency? Can you use them?

According to a 2010 finding from an SSA Office of General Counsel, the answer is absolutely not. Even if the medical consultant is only a contractor, it’s considered to be a “conflict of interest” and you have to find someone else for your case.

Social Security questions about losing benefits are common. What’s not as typical is people having their benefits taken away because of problems with the IRS.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what’s happening to some beneficiaries. The IRS tells the Social Security Administration that they’ve claimed income so their award is reduced or taken away completely. The problem is that these people haven’t actually been earning any extra money—they are victims of identity theft.

If you’re considering filing a disability claim, you might have Social Security questions about what Quick Disability Determinations, or QDDs, are and how they work. As an experienced Social Security Disability attorney, I get these questions all the time.

Basically, when someone has a condition that clearly meets disability standards, Social Security tries hard to ensure that they get benefits quickly. To speed up these claims, conditions that qualify as QDDs bypass the often lengthy approval process most applicants have to go through.

As a Texas Social Security Disability attorney, I try to pay attention to what’s going on in Washington so that I can ensure that my clients are prepared for what they’re likely to face when they start dealing with Social Security.

Recently, I read something that made my blood boil. In an effort to “reduce improper payments” (which really means helping the government get more money back), the SSA Office of Inspector General (OIG) released a report that criticized Social Security’s policy of administrative finality.

What exactly is “administrative finality”? Basically, it’s a policy that prevents the government from continually reopening your case to take money away from you after Social Security has made a final decision and a certain amount of time has passed. The policy was designed to protect people but now the government wants Social Security to get rid of it.